| Submitter | Laurent Charignon |
|---|---|
| Date | Jan. 18, 2016, 12:58 a.m. |
| Message ID | <9974c8d6d18a3d7d6bea.1453078733@lcharignon-mbp.local> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/12824/ |
| State | Deferred |
| Delegated to: | Pierre-Yves David |
| Headers | show |
Comments
On 01/18/2016 01:58 AM, Laurent Charignon wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Laurent Charignon <lcharignon@fb.com> > # Date 1453078729 28800 > # Sun Jan 17 16:58:49 2016 -0800 > # Node ID 9974c8d6d18a3d7d6bea7af46e914281f3cf224a > # Parent 4f83b2d2d20de55b2a63910ff10204af9106fd26 > touch: add 'revive' alias to the touch command > > We talk about 'reviving' changesets in the tests, so, let's add 'revive' as > an alias of touch. I'll hold a bit on that, lets discuss some consistent UI plan here. One of the main reason I'm not super excited to make that one step as-is comes from the fact that touch will currently happily work on non-obsolete changesets, not really reviving anything.
Patch
diff --git a/hgext/evolve.py b/hgext/evolve.py --- a/hgext/evolve.py +++ b/hgext/evolve.py @@ -2816,7 +2816,7 @@ def stripwrapper(orig, ui, repo, *revs, kwargs['biject'] = False return cmdprune(ui, repo, *revs, **kwargs) -@command('^touch', +@command('^touch|revive', [('r', 'rev', [], 'revision to update'), ('D', 'duplicate', False, 'do not mark the new revision as successor of the old one')], diff --git a/tests/test-touch.t b/tests/test-touch.t --- a/tests/test-touch.t +++ b/tests/test-touch.t @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Basic usage $ hg log -G @ 0:e93df3427f45 a - $ hg touch . + $ hg revive . $ hg log -G @ 1:[0-9a-f]{12} a (re)